B. Hussein Obama was touted as America’s foreign relations savior, the deity who would repair America’s image with the rest of the world. How has Obama done with the middle east? Not so good. He has bowed and scraped in front of the Saudi King, not been able to control Iran and Aquavelvejihad, upset Israel, bowed almost to the floor for the Japanese Emperor, and allowed the North Korean dwarf to push him around. How has B. Hussein Obama done with our greatest ally, Great Britain? He couldn’t have done any worse if he had defecated at the Queen’s feet.
What are the things Obama has done to insult the British and damage American relations with them?
* In February 2009 Obama sent back to England a bust of Winston Churchill that had been on display in the oval office since 9/11. This unannounced move blindsided the British.
* In March 2009, Obama disrespected Prime Minister Gordon Brown by not meeting him at the airport, for his first state visit with Obama. B. Hussein Obama could not be bothered to attend the press conference that he and the state department arranged.
* During Prime Minister Brown’s visit, Obama gave him a gift, a set of American DVD’s that won’t play on British DVD players. Never mind the fact that Prime Minister Brown is almost blind. Just to add insult to injury, Mrs. Obama gave Brown’s children some toy helicopters from a DC gift shop, made in China no doubt. Classless.
* Brown gave two symbolic gifts and one that expressed national pride. Brown came bearing a pen holder carved from the timbers of the sister ship of that which gave the wood to create the famous “Resolute Desk,” the desk that has been in America’s charge since 1880. He also gave Obama the framed commission for that famous ship, the HMS Resolute. His third gift was a seven-volume biography
of one of England’s greatest leaders, Winston Churchill. Classy.
* During this same visit, one of Brown’s aids tried to interact with one of Obama’s staff and they were informed that Britain was no different than any other country and would be treated as such. Nice.
* When the Brits call, no one in the White House answers. The Obama administration ignores the diplomatic calls designed to reaffirm international policy between the two countries.
* April 2009 Michelle ‘I hate America’ Obama violated protocol when in England by putting her hand on the queen’s back. The British were appalled by the Obama’s behavior.
* May 2009 Captain Obama left the Queen out of the D-Day ceremonies, demonstrating his contempt for the British and white people, but mostly white people, given his willingness to bow to middle east leaders and suck up to North Korea and Japan. Note that this incident occurred about the same time as Obama’s bowing to the Saudi King, showing more deference to Islam than to a democracy.
* June 2009, the British press began to openly ask why Obama hates Britain. Even the New York Times worried that, “on a more basic level, there is a sense that the Obama administration is ignoring the needs and counsel of longtime allies.”
B. Hussein Obama has once again shown his upturned nose to England, this time by failing to support their stance over the Falkland Islands. Obama’s silence on the issue of British sovereignty over the Falklands has empowered Argentina and left England twisting in the wind. Dear Leader has also canceled a conference with Britain, celebrating sixty years of intelligence sharing together. Captain Fantastic must not believe America needs the relationship with Britain.
Obama can get tough with the British and the French (who doesn’t get tough with the French?). He can push the Germans around, a little, but they push back. However, Obama turns to mush dealing with dictators like the dwarf in North Korea, gets all starry eyed over tin pot dictators and just melts at the feet of Islamic thugs. It is as if our weak leader takes his frustrations out on the nations that don’t give him trouble, to make up for the fact that nut jobs like Aquavelvejihad own him. Obama is a coward.
Bill Turner
US West Regional Director
www.anystreet.org
Special Projects Coordinator
www.resistnet.com
Blog: www.americanpatriotscommission.com
Host: http://www.resistnet.com/group/resistnetradioshow
Co-Founder/Senior Advisor: www.americanpatriotcommission.com
Founder: http://americaninfidels.ning.com/
Report Political Corruption: press@americanpatriotcommission.com
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading …
About Bill Turner
Pastor
Bill Turner (First American Patriot Church) is back in black. After
battling the forces of evil and serious health issues, Twitters
@Jihadihunter is back to provoke thought, emotion and action. You can
follow Bill on Facebookat the American Patriot Commissionand at Freedom Outlaw Radio
and Bill Turner is also the National Director United States of America Defence League USADL
found
at http://www.USADefenceLeague.org.Remember kids, although he is a pastor, he is prone to anti-social
behavior, bursts of anger and can often be seen flogging the left
wildly, with the antenna from a 1963 Chevy Impala. When asked, the FBI
had nothing good to say about Bill. Per Bill, “God bless America, except
you Godless Marxists.
You made your choice and you are on your own”.
- Web
- More Posts (152)
|
|
Posted in 
Add to Google
I’m simply presenting to you what actual British opinions are about the Iraq war.
Do you have any evidence that this is not, in fact, how British people feel about the matter?
Can you list any way in which British people gained by supporting the American invasion of Iraq?
And as for the reason you advance – I wasn’t born yesterday, Bill, and neither were you. You know perfectly well that the reason you name was not the main one used to justify the war, either domestically or internationally. It’s only now that it’s clear that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, and that he had absolutely no involvement in the September 11th attacks, that those who pushed the war back in 2002-2003 are falling back on their third-string humanitarian argument.
Iraq was not invaded for fun (although killing people who want to kill you isn’t a bad thing) or profit. Iraq was invaded to halt the abuses against the people that were being done by the government.
Note that I’m not calling him the Toxic Texan myself; I’m reporting to you the general opinions of people in Britain.
It is unfortunate, but true, that many people in Britain harbor prejudice against the US; but Bush was also the kind of guy calculated to inflame those prejudices.
We could, of course, discuss Obama’s relationship with Britain as if anything that occurred before November 2008 is lost to history; but that’s not how British people tend to approach things. They inevitably see Obama in comparison to Bush. What else would you reasonably expect?
Obama has an enormous reservoir of goodwill towards him in Britain, not because of anything he has done, but simply by virtue of not being his predecessor, whom it is fair to say was actively hated by a majority of British people.
You may well think it unfair, or prejudiced, or whatever, for them to feel that way; but it’s still true that they do. That’s not “Bush Derangement Syndrome.” It’s a fact, and any Briton will tell you the same.
Perhaps, if you want to start successfully contradicting what I’m saying, you could point me towards any way at all in which Britain benefited by supporting the United States’ invasion of Iraq…!
So, how long have you embraced Bush Derangement Syndrome?
As a British citizen, I’m reasonably well qualified to speak to this.
Since President Obama’s election, perceptions of the United States have improved markedly in Great Britain. There were very, very few British people left by 2008 who had anything but contempt for the man they called the “Toxic Texan.” George W. Bush was perceived as having had very little respect for the United Kingdom.
A friend doesn’t lure a friend into war on false pretenses.
A friend doesn’t promise in exchange to tackle global warming, and then do nothing.
Britain was Bush’s slave, not its friend. That’s no sort of alliance. Blair was a sucker for ever believing anything Bush said. Britain traded away a large part of its international reputation, and got nothing in return.
When it comes to Obama, he has done some things that offended British national pride, but he is still liked a great deal better than his predecessor. These kinds of blunder are, unfortunately, nothing new, and British people are used to them.
After Bush, no-one expects Americans to treat other countries with anything other than contempt. Obama’s mix of protocol violations with an occasional willingness to discuss things that matter to Britain actually represents a small step up. Members of the public really don’t care about protocol, whereas Bush’s missteps drew us into a war the British should never have been in, losing the lives of British soldiers in a cause not their own.
As for the Falklands…well, the Falklands really matter to the British. If Obama doesn’t see fit to provide the kind of assistance to Britain that Reagan was willing to provide to Thatcher, then I would hope that the British government should decide to pursue a less dependent course in its foreign policy, and put this whole notion of a “special relationship” to a quiet and unmourned death.
Sadly, they won’t. The British foreign policy establishment is like a battered spouse, returning and returning in the hope their partner will change. I’ve been arguing for a more mature relationship between friends for years. America needs friends abroad, not slaves, and it would have been good for America had Britain not been so subservient last time America wanted its help.