There are those who are quick to question my findings that refute Global Warming/Climate Change. However, in my research I thoroughly check every claim made who promote this propaganda, and find each claim and finding in support of Global Warming/Climate Change to be totally false and misleading. It takes a lot of detective work in separating false information from the actual facts, but the evidence is there for anyone who cares to spend the time and effort in finding it.

A comment from a reader of my recent article: “GLOBAL WARMING IS ALL ABOUT POLITICS AND NOTHING TO DO WITH SCIENCE” says I am hiding information and making up facts. This reader disputes my findings that there is no increase in CO2 in the atmosphere and refers me to a site where scientists at Mona Loa Observatory, Hawaii have been studying CO2 levels for years. The article basically states that observations show a substantial rise in CO2 levels over the last few years, and scientists there predict drastic rises in CO2 levels in the coming years, based on their findings.

On the surface this would seem indisputable, since reputable scientists are saying this based on their observations. However, while searching for discrepancies in their research, I found several clear and irreparable holes.

Their findings of more CO2 in the atmosphere surely are correct, but the reasons for the high rate of CO2 in this area aren’t being reported. This area where the scientists are recording this rise in CO2 is at Mona Loa Observatory, Hawaii. The observatory itself sits essentially on the rim of Mona Loi Volcano, which is an active volcano that erupted in the spring of 1984 and is currently considered active. The main gases released by volcanoes are H2O and CO2. These and other gases are constantly being released both from the actual crater and from fissures near the crater every day. So what we have here, are scientists at Mona Loa Observatory, recording drastic rises of atmospheric CO2 but failing to admit why this is. Of course, anyone will record high levels of CO2 when they are looking for it near an active volcano. So, these so-called scientific findings are as worthless and empty as a used Coca Cola bottle and should be thrown into the trash along with it.

The claim of ice loss at the poles is an outright lie that can be seen in NASA’s own satellite images. Anybody can look at an image of ice coverage and thickness today, and compare it to that of 2000 and see that more ice exists now than ten years ago. If one cares to take the time to hunt down this information they can find it, but you won’t find it by looking under climate change, global warming, and environmentally compromised sites. Other related information can be viewed at the CIA site.

I can disprove any information, data, or so called proof of Global Warming/Climate Change presented to me as lies, misrepresentation, or flawed data.

My example of the planet Mars having an atmosphere composed almost entirely of CO2 and not experiencing any warming is a true fact, not science fiction. The reader’s claim that I’m hiding the fact that Mars’ atmosphere is less than one percent that of Earth which is 142 times thicker than that of Mars is oxy-moronic. With a thinner atmosphere on Mars, this planet should receive a maximum amount of radiation from the sun, making it more prone to a Global Warming situation than if it were thinner. Obviously, another baseless claim.

As for my statement regarding massive inflation associated with any implemented Global Warming/Climate Change laws are concerned, anyone who thinks otherwise must have a drinking problem or be a certified dolt.

As for the comment that my findings about both NASA and the WMO were incorrect, I continuously find actual recorded weather and climate data which disputes their claims. Their findings are based on corrupted data in the form of computer models, which take actual temperatures along with an overall assessment of climate in a given area over many years, then add their estimated projections for an outcome, which will support their pseudoscience. I prefer to use actual recorded records of temperatures taken over many decades and look for any spikes in temperature over a substantial period of years. I have observed a spike in temperatures, but this was in the early 1900s. Since then, the overall temperatures in the world have remained constant or taken a dip.

Example after example is available, showing the false claims made by the IPCC, WMO and related environmental organizations, in trying to dupe the public into believing in their lies.

I refer the reader to an article by Dr. Nils Axel Morner exposing the myth.

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/MornerInterview.pdf

I will soon have a book out exposing the idea of Global Warming/Climate Change as one of the biggest lies in human history. In it, I will take the reader on a journey, exposing the pseudoscience behind the lie, the politics behind it and the people involved. I will give a slew of weather, geological and climatic facts supported by actual documented proof, which fly in the face of the false claims made by those involved in promoting this notorious agenda.

(No Ratings Yet)

 Loading …

About Tony Elliott

Truth AdvocateFreelance WriterAuthorCommentatorResearcher

• Mail

|

• Web

|

• More Posts (66)