SHARIA VS CONSTITUTION

It is coming. A showdown in America, not some wild west show, but a real showdown, just like Europe is facing, with Islam. Islam is not a religion but our government is treating it as such. Islam is a theocracy that governs citizens way of life, in the same way the Constitution is the light that governs America (when Congress is not in session). The forces of Islam in America are pushing the boundaries, in the hopes of establishing a Sharia based caliphate in America, and undoing western civilization. For those of you who still do not understand or believe that Islam is a threat, I am going to compare Sharia Law to the Constitution. You shall see that the “religion of peace” is really the religion of pieces, where the children blow up so quickly.

Sharia Law is well-documented in the 1,200 page Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, “The Reliance of the Traveler” by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, and published in the United States by Amana Publications. The Constitution is, well, the Constitution:

LEGISLATIVE POWERS

US Constitution
Article I – All legislative Powers shall be vested in the Congress.

Sharia Law
The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah. (a1.1) It is not a sin to comply with man-made laws that require buying auto insurance or having a photo ID because “the authorities are responsible for the sin, not the individual forced to comply.” (w42.3 and w50.4).

POWER TO DECLARE WAR

US Constitution
Section 8 – Powers of Congress include to levy taxes, to make laws, and to declare war.

Sharia Law
It is obligatory to obey the commands and interdictions of the caliph or his representative in everything that is lawful, even if he is unjust . . because the purpose of his authority is Islamic unity, which could not be realized if obeying him were not obligatory. (o25.5) The caliph or his representative have the duty of undertaking jihad if their territory borders on enemy lands, of dividing the spoils of battle, and of remitting a fifth for “deserving recipients.” (o25.9(8)) Jihad is obligatory for everyone when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims. (o9.3) It is permissible in jihad to cut down the enemy’s trees and destroy their dwellings. (o9.1)

PRESIDENT (CALIPH)

US Constitution
Article II, Section I — Qualifications of a President – He must be a natural born citizen, thirty-five years old, and a resident for fourteen years. The President is elected by ballot by the people (via the Electors) and shall serve for no more than 2 four-year terms.
No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Sharia Law

A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave, a male, of the Quraysh tribe, etc. (o25.0)

The Caliph appoints a group to select his successor among themselves. There is no a term of office. However, the caliphate of someone who seizes power is considered valid, even though his act of usurpation is disobedience, in view of the danger from anarchy and strife that would otherwise ensue. (o25.4(3))

REMOVAL OF GOVERNMENT OFFICERS

US Constitution

Section 4 – The President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from office if found guilty of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Sharia Law
(No provision for removal from office.)

LEGAL AUTHORITY

US Constitution

Article VI – This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made under it shall be the supreme law of the land, and judges in every state shall be bound by them. Senators and Representatives, legislative officers, all executive and judicial officers both of the United States and the several states shall be bound by a Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution.

Sharia Law
The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah. (a1.1)

CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS RIGHTS

US Constitution

Amendment 1 – Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.

Sharia Law

Non-Muslims are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. Non-Muslims are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures, or make a public display of feast days or funerals. Non-Muslims are forbidden to build new churches. A non-Muslim may not enter a mosque without permission. The protection for non-Muslims is withdrawn if a non-Muslim commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her, leads a Muslim away from Islam, kills a Muslim, or says anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam. (o11.5 through o11.10)

US Constitution

Amendment 2 – The right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Sharia Law

It is a condition that someone buying weapons be of a people who are not at war with Muslims. (k1.2(f)) Enormities (sins) include selling weapons to non-Muslims who will use them against us. (w52.1(192))

US Constitution

Amendment 3 – No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner prescribed by law.

Sharia Law

(Not covered.) However, the Pact of Omar (636 AD) imposed on Christians in Syria, “We shall keep our gates wide open for passersby and travelers. We shall give board and lodging to all Muslims who pass our way for three days.”

US Constitution

Amendments 4 – 8 – These amendments prohibit unreasonable searches, require due process according to the law, provide for confrontation of witnesses, impose jury trial on all matters involving over $20, and prohibit excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments. Amendment 14 provides for equal protection of the laws for all citizens.

Sharia Law

No testimony may be made by people who have lowly jobs, such as a street sweeper or a bath house attendant, or non-Muslim. (o24.2-3) Testimony regarding fornication or sodomy requires four male eye-witnesses to the act. (o24.9) A woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man. (o24.10) (There is no provision for a jury trial under Sharia Law.) Cruel and unusual Islamic punishments include 1) stoning for adultery (o12.2); 2) scourging 40 lashes with hands, shoes, ends of clothes, or a whip for drunkenness (o16.3); 3) severing the right hand for theft of over $36 and the left foot for a repeat offense (o14.1); and 4) death for apostasy from Islam. (o8.2) Indemnity for accidentally killing a male Muslim is 100 camels or 4,235 grams of gold. (Current value: $144,000.) Indemnity for killing a woman is half that of a man, for killing a Jew or a Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a killing Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth of that of a Muslim. The indemnity for causing a miscarriage is one slave. (o4.9) There is no indemnity for a killing a non-Muslim at war with Muslims, an apostate, or someone sentenced to death by stoning. (o14.17) Jews and Christians are subject to a “poll tax” not less than 1 dinar (Current value: $144) per adult male per year. No maximum is stipulated. (o11.4) This is a penalty for remaining in their ancestral religion instead of embracing the “religion of truth.” (o9.8) A husband may beat a “rebellious” wife for 1) not allowing immediate sexual intercourse when he asks for it, at home, and if she can physically endure it; 2) answering him coldly; or 3) being averse when she was previously kind. (m5.1 and m10.12) The only limitation is that he may not break her bones, wound her, or cause bleeding.

US Constitution

Amendment 13 Slavery and involuntary servitude are abolished.

Sharia Law

The section on Slavery (k32.0) is not translated into English. The provisions remain in Arabic. The editor of “The Reliance of the Traveler” claims that these provisions are no longer applicable, yet they remain in there in the text of Sharia Law. Elsewhere, the manual states, “Originally the status of slave was simply the outcome of having been taken as a prisoner of war. A captive who could not buy his own freedom by means of ransom remained in the possession of the captor until he had earned his freedom by work or until he was granted liberty by his master.” (w13.1)

US Constitution

Amendment 21 repealed “prohibition,” thereby allowing manufacture, sale, and transport of alcoholic beverages.

Sharia Law

It is unlawful to sell grapes to someone who will make wine from them. (k4.9) “Allah cursed whoever drinks wine, gives it to others to drink, sells it, buys it, presses it for another, transports it, receives it, or eats its price.” Enormities (sins) include drinking wine in any form or other intoxicant, even if only a drop as in medicine; pressing out the juice to make wine or other intoxicant; carrying it for purposes of drinking, or having it carried; serving it to others or having it served; selling it; buying it; having it bought or sold; consuming proceeds from selling it; or keeping wine or other intoxicant. (o16.6 and w52.1(350-361))

My fellow Americans, the next time someone says we need to be more tolerant, more understanding, more accepting of Islam and Sharia Law, ask them, “What part(s) of the Constitution are you willing to abandon in order to accommodate Sharia Law?” Then do not say a word. He/she that speaks first loses. If they try to wander off course, change the subject or insult you, simply restate the question and wait. This is too important a fight to just walk away.

This column was originally published in The Cypress Times on 12-26-09.

Bill Turner
Assistant National Coordinator
The Patriotic Resistance
www.resistnet.com

US Western Regional Coordinator
Modern Conservative/Anystreet.org
www.anystreet.org

Co-Founder/Senior Advisor
The American Patriot Commission
www.americanpatriotcommission.com

Blog: www.americanpatriotscommission.com

Twitter: Czarhunter

Report government corruption and abuse: press@americanpatriotcommission.com

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Loading ... Loading …


About Bill Turner

Pastor
Bill Turner (First American Patriot Church) is back in black. After
battling the forces of evil and serious health issues, Twitters
@Jihadihunter is back to provoke thought, emotion and action. You can
follow Bill on Facebookat the American Patriot Commissionand at Freedom Outlaw Radio
and Bill Turner is also the National Director United States of America Defence League USADL
found
at http://www.USADefenceLeague.org.Remember kids, although he is a pastor, he is prone to anti-social
behavior, bursts of anger and can often be seen flogging the left
wildly, with the antenna from a 1963 Chevy Impala. When asked, the FBI
had nothing good to say about Bill. Per Bill, “God bless America, except
you Godless Marxists.
You made your choice and you are on your own”.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “SHARIA VS CONSTITUTION”

  1. R_not says:

    k32.0 is not translated because the moslems don’t want to answer to it. They signed an agreement to abolish slavery but they have not. There is an active slave trade going to this day. And they just deny it and as with every thing else – everyone ignores the atrocities in islam, or just go ‘bad boys… stop that’ and life goes on.

    What they do to the children is atrocious but they lie about it. We have a big problem because people are afraid to stand up to the moslems. moslems cannot handle criticism – they have had 1400 years, and still going strong in many areas, of absolute control on killing any critics. They they resort to deflection, all sorts of logic errors, bashing, and intimidation and threats, and they can get violent very easily.

    And that brings up another thing – zakat. Why we allow them to keep giving that when it states outright that part of that is to go to fund their violent jihadists. For that matter, we got a muzz brotherhood whose stated goals is to subjugate or kill us too and so many just fall for their deception. They are masters at deception AND VICTIMHOOD – that way they don’t have to be accountable or responsible (remember that zakat they give funds their violence)!

    Their mosques are outposts in the lands they think they have conquered – look up mesjids – they can be compared to military bases where the umma, the imams/clerics are their officers behind riling the umma up. Most moslems don’t read the koran in a language they understand so someone is telling them what to do, say, etc.

  2. bob says:

    wow..thanks…great work

  3. EV says:

    What does the “w” and “o” refer to before what seems to be chapter and verse. For example, in “the authorities are responsible for the sin, not the individual forced to comply.” (w42.3 and w50.4).

  4. Anonymous says:

    Great article and comparrison!!!

    How in the world is that officer suppose to ID the ‘person’ in the burka?!?!?!? ID cards do not do any good when they will not show who they are, in the flesh. That could be a man for all we know, and of course it could be a suicide bomber, man or woman.

  5. PatriotUSA says:

    Reakky good post here and I will use at my site with links back to here and proper credits given.

    Islam is the new nazism

    of our time.

  6. Zander says:

    …Because not all Muslims are stone-wielding fanatics.

    Just because you see connections between disparate events, does not mean they actually are connected. You don’t have a good track record of clear and critical reasoning. Why should I trust that you and these particular authors are right, when there are plenty of credible authors who see things differently?

    Since we’re recommending books, try the bestselling “Three Cups of Tea” by Greg Mortensen. Note particularly the parts where the mullahs of Iran come to the defense of the project of building girls’ schools, and where the devoutly Muslim village elders desperately want to see their daughters get an education.

  7. Turner says:

    You wrote: By your reasoning, such a person as she cannot exist; which makes clear that your reasoning is flawed.

    Wrong. She obviously exists, she just hasn’t been stoned yet.

    As for Sharia in America, read Islam 101 on Jihadwatch.org and try a couple of books: Muslim Mafia and The Politically Incorrect Guide To Islam.

    Muslim Mafia shows clearly how sharia is being slowly imposed in America, through CAIR and other terrorist organizations that are part of the Muslim Brotherhood.

  8. zander says:

    …but not every Christian does condone it.

    There’s a broad gap between what your sacred text says you should believe or do, and what you actually believe or do.

    The middle ground of not doing or believing what your sacred text says may not be logically consistent, but you’ll find most Christians and most Muslims and most adherents of all religions squarely right there. Ask all the Catholics who use contraceptives.

    For example, my aunt converted to Islam in her forties, and now lives in Bahrain. She has never offered me or any members of her family, as infidels, the choice to “convert, submit or die.” She lives by her creed, and we by our respective creeds.

    By your reasoning, such a person as she cannot exist; which makes clear that your reasoning is flawed.

    Also – I did ask you to show an actual mechanism whereby sharia would come to power in the United States, and you did not – which makes me think that you do, on some level realize that it can’t.

  9. Turner says:

    There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim. The Koran commands that all Muslims commit jihad. It commands that Muslims offer infidels the chance to convert, submit, or die. There is no middle ground and if you read: The Koran, The Politically Incorrect Guide To Islam, and The Muslim Mafia, you wouldn’t ask questions like that.

    You and I have been down this path before and you take the liberal talking point position each time, rather than read, with an open mind, fact based books that explain to you that this struggle will continue until one side is dead.

  10. Zander says:

    They are not and shall never be compatible.

    But tell me, what makes you perceive the imposition of sharia as a realistic or imminent possibility in the United States? You write luridly that “the showdown is coming”, but in reality, at the most generous estimate, Muslims constitute two [2] per cent of the population of the US; of that two percent, only a smaller proportion want to replace the Constitution with sharia. The other 98% of Americans are entirely uninterested in leading lives ruled by sharia law, and likely will remain so.

    So what’s the mechanism here?

    Would any attack launched by supporters of sharia actually lead to the forcible imposition of sharia in the US? Not in a million Sundays.

    Is any bill being proposed by anyone that would privilege sharia over the Constitution? Again, not in a million of Sundays.

    The threat from Islam is one of violent attacks; but Muslim extremists are not capable of forcing the United States to adopt their laws, their way of life, or anything approximating either. They have worse arms and armies, poorer economies, and the only reason they play any part at all in US foreign policy is oil.

    So don’t waste time ginning up boojums. The only purpose of such arguments is to make Americans more afraid, and therefore more tolerant of assaults on their own liberties in the name of keeping them safe from some subhuman Other.

Leave a Reply


− six = 3

Powered by WordPress