A recent Texas AFT survey of public school superintendents from 241 districts found that state budget cuts of $5.4 billion are having a significant impact on classroom instruction, teacher morale and help for struggling students.

“Students are not being sheltered from budget cuts, as some of the state’s leadership suggested would be the case last year when they took an axe to public education funding,” said Texas AFT President Linda Bridges. “Instead superintendents are telling us that teacher layoffs, larger class sizes and cuts in services for struggling students are creating a stressful environment and creating concerns about how to deal with the implementation of the new standardized tests being rolled out this spring.”

As one superintendent noted, “The funds to produce a world-class educational system in Texas are there. The willingness to invest in our kids and our state is not. Cut now, pay later. Our state leadership has failed us.”

Texas AFT mailed surveys to 1,051 superintendents throughout the state in December and received 241 responses, 23 percent of the districts statewide. The superintendent survey findings echo concerns revealed in a November Texas AFT online survey of some 3,500 teachers and school employees regarding the impacts of budget cuts. That report also showed widespread teacher layoffs, increased class sizes, cuts to key services designed to help students pass standardized tests, and stressful working environments for teachers.

Bridges said superintendents noted that most positions eliminated from budgets cuts were for teachers. She added that a large number of superintendents said that larger class sizes and mounting pressures to achieve on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) tests this spring were likely to drive others out of the profession.

One superintendent wrote, “I believe more experienced teachers (about to retire) will leave the profession and more younger teachers will do all that they can to find jobs in other professions. Why go where you are not appreciated.” Another stated, “Most staff are thankful to have a job, and I feel they will stay in place for the next three years. After that, the accountability system will drive them out.”

In the November survey of school employees, 81 percent of respondents said the school climate for students, teachers and staff was worse or much worse, with 72 percent saying it was “stressful and taxing” and another 9 percent describing it as “hostile and unfriendly.”

“Superintendents are backing up what teachers and school employees by the thousands have told us,” Bridges said. “There’s no getting around the fact that budget cuts are hurting students, teachers and administrators, and our state’s future will suffer because the state’s leadership has let us down.”

Bridges added: “Superintendents are community leaders whose job it is to inspire achievement, so they generally tend to assume a ‘can-do’ attitude publicly in the face of daunting challenges like these budget cuts. But there’s also a time to be candid, and this survey gave these leaders an opportunity to say just how dire situations are in our schools.” (For a complete report on the online survey of school employees, see www.texasaft.org)

Key Findings of Survey

• Respondents reported 6,480 positions cut in the 2011-2012 school year, with the largest number (3,052) being teaching positions. (Note that these numbers only represent cuts from 23% of the state’s districts. The November Texas AFT survey of school employees reported that 92% of districts cut positions. Extrapolating from the superintendent survey, estimates of total positions cut would exceed 30,000.)

• As a response to budget cuts, superintendents said their districts anticipate:
— Cutting employee salaries (9% of respondents)
— Cutting health-care benefits (10%)
— Cutting stipends for extra duties, hard-to-staff positions, bilingual education or educational achievement (20%)
— Using some portion of their fund balance/reserves (60% of respondents)
— Invoking financial exigency (6%)
— Using employee furlough days (6%)
— Calling for a Tax Ratification Election in the next 2-3 years to increase local tax revenue (10%)

• 5% of superintendents said their districts are charging fees for extracurricular activities.

More About the Survey

• 241 responses (23% of 1,051 Texas school districts)

• Respondent districts by number of students served
— 25,000 or more students (13)
— 10,000 to 25,000 students (10)
— 5,000 to 10,000 students (17)
— 1,000 to 5,000 students (86)
— 1,000 or fewer students (115)

Survey Comments included:

Impacts of Cuts on Instruction

“We have fewer programs, and a narrower curriculum. We went from an academic ‘full meal’ to ‘bread and water.’”

“Devastating. We have been cutting every year since 2006.”

“The reductions are having a direct impact on the quality of instruction in the classroom.”

— “Technology will take a big hit.”
— “Not able to provide necessary materials and supplies.”
— “Less resources to support struggling students.”
— “Lack of personnel for intensive remediation.”
— “Loss of reading specialists, intervention programs and summer school for struggling students.”

Impacts of Class-Size Increases on Student Performance

“Everyone will suffer. Struggling students will be left behind, strong students will be leveling off with little or no time or resources for enrichment. Teachers and staff will be stretched and stressed to meet performance standards.”

“The increase has detrimental effects, particularly with respect to achievement of SES [Supplemental Education Services] and minority students, especially in the lower grades.”

“Teachers have more to do with less time and resources, which will negatively affect their ability to do their job. And it will have a negative impact on student performance.”

— “Less individualized instructional time.”
— “Lower passing rates.”
— “Lower performance on new STAAR exams.”
— “Reduced teacher effectiveness, increased teacher stress, less individualized attention, resulting in decreased student performance.”
— “Increased paperwork for each class and less time available for instructional planning.”

Impacts of Class-Size Increases on Teacher Retention

“The teaching staff is increasingly frustrated and demoralized. Anyone who can is getting out of the profession. I am very worried about the future of public education.”

“It is already causing teachers to reconsider their vocation. It is expediting early retirements and young teachers are leaving the profession.”

“Morale will decrease; willingness to come to work will decrease, eventually leading to an exodus of teachers and fewer college graduates wanting to enter education.”

“I truly feel sorry for secondary teachers who have a teaching load of 150-175 students.”

— “Will cause job dissatisfaction and early burnout.”
— “It’s crowd control, babysitting.”
— “The workload will drive teachers to professions where they are respected.”
— “It will make it harder to retain the best teachers.”

STAAR-Related

“We will have to cut back on special curriculum for at-risk students and STAAR preparation.”

“With STAAR, we’re worried that they won’t perform as well.”

“Increased class sizes will lower performance, especially on STAAR.”

“Delay the STAAR implementation until the financial situation is stabilized.”

What should the state’s response be to the situation?

“Fix the structural deficit from 2006 and look for new sources of revenue.”

“The poorer districts are being hit hardest…It’s not fair that some districts’ target revenue is $12,000 and mine is $5,100.”

“Give back local control on property taxes. Remove the cap.”

“Close loopholes in the business tax.”

“They should have used all of the Rainy Day Fund and made education a priority.”

“We do not have a funding crisis in Texas. We have a leadership crisis that has manifested itself in the state budget.”

(No Ratings Yet)

 Loading …

About No Author

• More Posts (27156)