
Since 1995 the Heritage Foundation and the Wall Street Journal have monitored
the economic freedoms of countries around the world and have published their
results in the 2010
Index of Economic Freedom. Ideas like "economic freedom" are a
little subjective, but I like the stated view of the publication. According to
the editors, economic freedom is defined as "the fundamental right of
every human to control his or her own labor and property. In an economically
free society, individuals are free to work, produce, consume, and invest in any
way they please, with that freedom both protected by the state and
unconstrained by the state. In economically free societies, governments allow
labor, capital and goods to move freely, and refrain from coercion or
constraint of liberty beyond the extent necessary to protect and maintain
liberty itself."
As far as methodology, the editors "measure ten components of economic
freedom, assigning a grade in each using a scale from 0 to 100, where 100
represents the maximum freedom. The ten component scores are then averaged to
give an overall economic freedom score for each country. The ten components of
economic freedom are: business freedom, trade freedom, fiscal freedom,
government spending, monetary freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom,
property rights, freedom from corruption, and Labor Freedom."
We Americans like to believe that we live in the "land of the free and the
home of the brave." Yet, most Americans note that our country is in
decline. The top ten list of the 183 considered in the survey, gives you an
idea of how bad it has become.
The US does not appear in the top five. Using school standards and 90 plus is
an "A," no country on the list meets that criteria. With that, number
1 goes to Hong Kong at 89.7, declining 0.3 percent from 2009. The country
reached this high status because of its "competitive tax regime, respect
for property rights, and flexible labor market, coupled with an educated and
highly motivated workforce, have stimulated an innovative, prosperous economy.
Hong Kong is one of the world’s leading financial and business centers, and its
legal and regulatory framework for the financial sector is transparent and
efficient. Business regulation is straightforward. Despite the global economic
slowdown, Hong Kong has maintained its status as Asia’s second-largest
destination for foreign direct investment, attracting over $60 billion in
2008."
The other countries in the top four are Singapore (number 2 at 86.1 percent,
down .1 percent), Australia (number 3 at 82.6 percent, with no change), New
Zealand (number 4 at 82.1 percent, up.1 percent), and Ireland (number 5 at 81.3
percent, down .9 percent). New Zealand is only one of two countries in the top
ten list to go up. According to the editors, "New Zealand continues to be
a global leader in economic freedom, performing well on most of the components
measured in the Index. The economy has an impressive record of market reforms
and benefits from its openness to global trade and investment. The banking
sector is characterized by sound regulations and prudent lending practices, and
well-implemented structural reforms have allowed the New Zealand economy to
weather the recent global financial and economic crisis relatively
unscathed."
Countries six and seven round up the top tier of economic freedom (those with a
"B"). The US fails to show up again. Switzerland (number 6 at 81.1
percent, up 1.7 percent) and Canada (number 7 at 80.4 percent, down 0.1
percent) occupy those spots. Switzerland is the other in the top ten to
actually go up over the last year.
The United States (number 8 at 78.0 percent, down 2.7 percent) is one of three
countries that rounds up the top ten with Denmark (number 9 at 77.9 percent,
down 1.7 percent) and Chile (number 10 at 77.2 percent, down 1.1 percent).
These countries did not even make it to the top tier, being below 80 percent
and the United States had the dubious distinction of seeing the biggest decline
in the past year (2.7 percent) among the top ten. In the arena of economic
freedom, the US has a low score of "C+" at 78.0 percent.
The study notes that the "U.S. government’s interventionist responses to
the financial and economic crisis that began in 2008 have significantly
undermined economic freedom and long-term prospects for economic growth.
Economic freedom has declined in seven of the 10 categories measured in the
Index." It also states that "Uncertainties caused by ongoing
regulatory changes and politically influenced stimulus spending have
discouraged entrepreneurship and job creation, slowing recovery. Leadership in
free trade has been undercut by 'Buy American' provisions in stimulus
legislation and failure to pursue previously agreed free trade agreements with
Panama, Colombia, and South Korea. Tax rates are increasingly uncompetitive,
and massive stimulus spending is creating unprecedented deficits. Bailouts of
financial and automotive firms have generated concerns about property
rights."
Imagine, the US is a "second tier country" on the fast track of
decline after only one year of one of the most anti-free market Administrations
in US history. It will be interesting to see if the US is still in the top ten
after the Obama presidency comes to an end.